Marvin Netuschil vs Johann Willems Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W L W L
Form
L W L L W W L W W LH2H: Netuschil 1 - 0 Willems
They have played 2 sets in total, with Netuschil winning 2 and Willems winning 0. The last match between Netuschil and Willems was at the Germany F6, 09-07-2016, Semifinals, Clay with Marvin Netuschil getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marvin Netuschil | 1 |
| Johann Willems | 0 |
Germany F6(09-07-2016)
6
3
6
3
| Netuschil | Stats | Willems |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 857 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 306 | Highest Rank | 869 |
| 33 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 10 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (257-183) | Career Total W/L | 56% (88-68) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Marvin Netuschil
Player
Johann Willems
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:35:0 | Average Match Time | 1:35:0 |
| 71% (45/63) | 1st Serve % | 62% (34/55) |
| 71% (32/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (22/34) |
| 50% (9/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (7/21) |
| 100% (4/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 17% (1/6) |
| 47% (26/55) | Return Points Win % | 35% (22/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marvin Netuschil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-3 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Marvin Netuschil
50%
(
14 of
28)
1st Serve %
55%
(
16 of
29)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
79%
(
11 of
14)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
11 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
34
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marvin Netuschil
Player
Justin Engel
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-7(6) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Marvin Netuschil
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marvin Netuschil
Player
Lilian Marmousez
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
1
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
0
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Marvin Netuschil
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Netuschil
Player
Alen Moritz Hodzic
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Johann Willems Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Oscar Moraing
Player
Johann Willems
48%
(
43 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 2-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Johann Willems
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
13 of
47)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Johann Willems
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (257/183) | Win/Loss | 56% (88/68) |
| 57% (572/427) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (197/151) |
| 53% (4928/4385) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (1704/1498) |
| 46% (22/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) |
| 63% (205/119) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (55/41) |
| 44% (30/38) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (23/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 461 | Aces Total | 200 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 658 | Total Double Faults | 206 |
| 1:2:2 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 570.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 370.1 |
| 66% (10878/16395) | 1st Serve % | 56% (2012/3606) |
| 65% (7058/10878) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1339/2012) |
| 49% (2690/5517) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (762/1594) |
| 46% (922/1998) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (148/337) |
| 44% (7428/16890) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1395/3581) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (13/11) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 59% (244/172) | Futures W/L | 58% (88/63) |
| 59% (256/437) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (88/153) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (62/114) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 32% (11/34) |
| 52% (63/122) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (18/39) |
| 90% (248/222) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (89/73) |
| 10% (248/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (89/16) |
| 18% (192/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (67/15) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
